RESUMO
Antecedentes: la esofagitis eosinofílica (EEo) activa se asocia a alteraciones en el calibre, la distensibilidad y la motilidad esofágica que podrían revertir con el tratamiento. Objetivos: estudiar el diámetro, la distensibilidad y la contractilidad esofágica en sujetos sanos comparándolos con pacientes con EEo antes y después del tratamiento. Métodos: estudio cuasiexperimental. Mediante EndoFLIP, se analizaron el cuerpo esofágico y la unión esofagogástrica (UEG) de los tres grupos, y se diseñó un programa para obtener los valores de diámetro, distensibilidad y contractilidad esofágica. Resultados: incluimos diez voluntarios sanos (24-61 años, seis hombres) y nueve pacientes con EEo (21-52 años, siete hombres). El índice de distensibilidad de la UEG fue de 5,07 mm2/Hg en controles, 2,40 mm2/Hg en EEo antes del tratamiento y 2,46 mm2/Hg después; la meseta de distensibilidad fue de 20,02 mm, 15,43 mm y 17,41 mm, respectivamente; y el diámetro, de 21,90 mm, 17,73 mm y 18,30 mm, con diferencias significativas (p < 0,05) excepto entre los diámetros de controles y pacientes tratados (p = 0,079). Las contracciones anterógradas repetitivas aparecieron en el 90 % de los controles, en el 66,7 % de EEo a antes del tratamiento y en el 88,9 % después (p > 0,05). Conclusiones: el índice de distensibilidad de la UEG, la meseta de distensibilidad y el diámetro en controles son mayores que en pacientes, aunque seis semanas de tratamiento parece poco tiempo para ver cambios significativos en la biomecánica esofágica. Las contracciones anterógradas repetitivas son el patrón predominante en sanos y en EEo. Aportamos valores de normalidad de la biomecánica esofágica medida mediante planimetría por impedancia en nuestro entorno.(AU)
Background: active eosinophilic esophagitis is associated with esophageal caliber, distensibility and motility changes that may be reversed with treatment. Objectives: to study esophageal diameter, distensibility and contractility in healthy subjects compared to patients with eosinophilic esophagitis, both before and after treatment. Methods: a quasi-experimental study, EndoFLIP, was used to analyze the esophageal body and esophago-gastric junction (EGJ) in all three groups, and a program was designed to obtain esophageal diameter, distensibility and contractility values. Results: ten healthy volunteers (24-61 years, six men) and nine patients with eosinophilic esophagitis (21-52 years, seven men) were included. The esophagogastric junction distensibility index was 5.07 mm2/Hg in the control subjects, 2.40 mm2/Hg in the subjects with eosinophilic esophagitis before treatment and 2.46 mm2/Hg after treatment. The distensibility plateau was 20.02 mm, 15.43 mm and 17.41 mm, respectively, and the diameter was 21.90 mm, 17.73 mm and 18.30 mm, showing significant differences (p < 0.05), except between control subjects and patients after treatment (p = 0.079). Repetitive antegrade contractions developed in 90 % of control subjects, 66.7 % of eosinophilic esophagitis patients before treatment and 88.9 % of the latter after treatment (p > 0.05). Conclusions: esophago-gastric junction distensibility index, distensibility plateau and diameter values were higher in controls than in patients, although six weeks of treatment seems a short period to observe significant changes in esophageal biomechanics. Repetitive antegrade contractions are the predominant pattern in healthy subjects and eosinophilic esophagitis. We provide normality values for esophageal biomechanics, measured by impedance planimetry in our setting.(AU)
Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Esofagite Eosinofílica/diagnóstico , Doenças do Esôfago/tratamento farmacológico , Complacência (Medida de Distensibilidade) , Transtornos de Deglutição , Junção Esofagogástrica , Fenômenos Biomecânicos , Espanha , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Gastroenteropatias , Doenças do Sistema DigestórioRESUMO
BACKGROUND: active eosinophilic esophagitis is associated with esophageal caliber, distensibility and motility changes that may be reversed with treatment. OBJECTIVES: to study esophageal diameter, distensibility and contractility in healthy subjects compared to patients with eosinophilic esophagitis, both before and after treatment. METHODS: a quasi-experimental study, EndoFLIP™, was used to analyze the esophageal body and esophago-gastric junction (EGJ) in all three groups, and a program was designed to obtain esophageal diameter, distensibility and contractility values. RESULTS: ten healthy volunteers (24-61 years, six men) and nine patients with eosinophilic esophagitis (21-52 years, seven men) were included. The esophagogastric junction distensibility index was 5.07 mm2/Hg in the control subjects, 2.40 mm2/Hg in the subjects with eosinophilic esophagitis before treatment and 2.46 mm2/Hg after treatment. The distensibility plateau was 20.02 mm, 15.43 mm and 17.41 mm, respectively, and the diameter was 21.90 mm, 17.73 mm and 18.30 mm, showing significant differences (p < 0.05), except between control subjects and patients after treatment (p = 0.079). Repetitive antegrade contractions developed in 90 % of control subjects, 66.7 % of eosinophilic esophagitis patients before treatment and 88.9 % of the latter after treatment (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: esophago-gastric junction distensibility index, distensibility plateau and diameter values were higher in controls than in patients, although six weeks of treatment seems a short period to observe significant changes in esophageal biomechanics. Repetitive antegrade contractions are the predominant pattern in healthy subjects and eosinophilic esophagitis. We provide normality values for esophageal biomechanics, measured by impedance planimetry in our setting.
